Büyülenme Hakkında C# IStructuralEquatable nedir

Büyülenme Hakkında C# IStructuralEquatable nedir

Blog Article

If two objects compare birli equal, the GetHashCode method for each object must return the same value. However, if two objects do hamiş compare bey equal, the GetHashCode methods for the two object do hamiş have to return different values.

Now, when we call Equals ourselves it will directly call our new fancy Equals that takes in a ScreenMetrics, which is great.

The following example creates two identical 3-tuple objects whose components consist of three Double values. The value of the second component is Double.NaN. The example then calls the Tuple.Equals method, and it calls the IStructuralEquatable.Equals method three times. The first time, it passes the default equality comparer that is returned by the EqualityComparer.

Daniel A.A. PelsmaekerDaniel A.A. Pelsmaeker 49.2k2121 gold badges112112 silver badges160160 bronze badges 5 In addition to answers which point to duplicate hashcodes kakım is documented behavior, some reasoning and reflection would also lead you to the same conclusion.

Although I think the gains from not boxing will be less than the cost for having CanEqual. In that case you should seal your types and you no longer need CanEqual. Sealing also katışıksız some performance benefits.

– Royi Namir Commented Mar 3, 2012 at 18:04 @RoyiNamir user844541's answer is correct, but maybe it is still hard for you to understand without a concrete example, if you are familiar with IEqualityComparer and how it is used by Linq's Distinct(), then after check the source code to see how it implement IStructuralEquatable on referencesource.microsoft.com/#mscorlib/system/collections/…, then you will see how it work.

1 My understanding is that it's used for collection like types, and encapsulates the structural part of the comparison, but leaved the comparison of the elements to a comparer passed in by the user. But I'm not really sure if I really got it.

In my implementation I delegated the task of calculating hash codes to the internal array. While testing it, to my great surprise, I found that my two different arrays had the same structural hash code

Coming soon: Throughout 2024 we will be phasing out GitHub C# IStructuralEquatable Temel Özellikleri Issues birli the feedback mechanism for content and replacing it with a new feedback system. For more information see: .

I had the same question. When I ran LBushkin's example I was surprised to see that I got a different answer! Even though that answer katışıksız 8 upvotes, it is wrong. After a lot of 'reflector'ing, here is my take on things.

Net on a certain ortam, I'm compelled to issue the standard warning not to rely on the values of hashcodes or how they are computed, since it is derece guaranteed to be the same across updates or platforms.

Upgrade to Microsoft Edge to take advantage of the latest features, security updates, and technical support.

Fantasy TV series with a male protagonist who uses a bow and arrows and has a hawk/falcon/eagle type bird companion

Burada ilgi ederseniz şayet ms.x ve ms.y bileğalışverişmeyeceğinden dolayı bir Deep Copy kavil konusudur. şayet referans tipli binalar olsalardı hordaki kadar bir sonuç elde edilecekti ve Shallow Copy lakırtı konusu olacaktı.